The Sri Lankan Press Institute will conclude a three-day
conference on Media Ethics in the Age of Globalization in Colombo, Sri Lanka, today.
Prof Shunkantala Rao on the far right with colleagues |
In the first session yesterday, Professor Clifford Christians
of University of Illinoise and Professor Shukantala Rao of Department of
Communication Studies, State University of New York, co-chaired the first
session over the topic “Global media ethics and ethics within regional and
local context.
The second session, Professor Shakuntala Rao
co-chaired and moderate a panel with Dr Vipul Mudgal, Dr Ranga Kalansooriya and
Mr U Myint Kyaw, over the topic “Media Ethics in Emerging Democracy”.
At the third second. Mr Javid Yusuf moderate a panel
comprised of Mr Kamal Siddiqi, Dr Maneesha S. Wanasinghe-Pasqual and M Eric
Cinje over the topic: “The Role of the Media in Conflict Resolution”.
In the final session of the day, Dr Vipul Mudgal of India chaired and moderate the panel discussion over the topic: “Citizen Journalism and Social Media Ethics”. Two trained and practicing journalists, now migrating from print media to the social media platform, presented papers on the benefits, successes and challenges of the citizen journalism and social media.
The first presenter was Duran Angiki of Pasifik Wantoks International, a journalist originally from the Solomon Islands, but now residing in Australia and Mr Nalaka Gunawardene, a print journalist from Colombo, Sri Lanka, now using the social media as a medium of publication and communication.
The panel discussion generated huge interests with educators,
communication specialists, media experts, practitioners and representatives of
various regional press councils, local government departments, print,
television, radio and social media were given opportunities to discuss issues
relating to their researches and experiences.
In addition, participants also debated issues relating
to the importance of legislating laws to govern media freedom in emerging democracy,
journalists and media code of conducts and ethical practices, where a deep
divide emerged amongst journalists’ on-one-side and academics and government
spin-doctors on the other.
In both camps, government officials, communication specialists
and educators advocate the idea of governments playing a role in legislating
laws to govern the use of the social media, while journalists argued against and
warned that allowing
governments to legislate laws – on behalf of citizens – is
a recipe for disaster as governments are always acted on self-interests.
In the final analysis of the debate, Angiki was given
an opportunity to pitch his case. He argued that journalists are often hard
done by the public and critics in every given country. But regardless of the
critical observation by some sections of the public, journalists are by nature
law abiding citizens, whose took pride of their work and role.
In every country,
there are professionals in the fields of
education, law and medicine, but no one scrutinize their failures as much as they did to
journalists. The reality is - in most cases – teachers and educators, who are
also professionals, send their failures to the streets and unemployment queues
because they cannot help them to progress in education. Lawyers hide their
failures by sending and locking them up in jails and doctors bury their
failures in graves and cemeteries. But journalists live another day to face
public criticisms and even killed in the line of duty.
In essence, journalists are the bravest of all
professionals. They fought over centuries to protect the rights of citizens to freedom
of expression. For decades journalists developed a thick-skin attitude and
resilient to keep on moving regardless of facing constant abuse, assault, harassment,
death threat to their own lives and the lives of their families, all in the
name of upholding the fundamental rights of citizens to freedom of
expression and human dignity.
As once stated by a Kenyan journalist, in response to constant criticisms of his work that he has heard of many cases and stories of governments and military regimes taking over newspapers, newsrooms and jailing journalists, but he has never heard one story of a news editor or publisher taking over a government. It is to the credit of journalists that we are talking ethics this week.
As once stated by a Kenyan journalist, in response to constant criticisms of his work that he has heard of many cases and stories of governments and military regimes taking over newspapers, newsrooms and jailing journalists, but he has never heard one story of a news editor or publisher taking over a government. It is to the credit of journalists that we are talking ethics this week.
Today the conference will continue in its last day
with topics such as “Are Ethics Possible in a Globalize World, Covering
Elections Ethically, The Ethics of Contentious Cartoons and Freedom of
Expression and Global Media Ethics: What is in the Future?
No comments:
Post a Comment